Proposal Category
 

 

Content Knowledge

The proposal builds and expands the core competencies of the individual's disciplinary interests and expertise (e.g. acquiring new skills, mastering the newest information/technologies, etc.).

 

Pedagogy

The proposal seeks to develop new methodologies/techniques for teaching, course delivery, student assessment

Scholarship

The proposal advances the candidate's research pursuits (e.g. book proposals, research papers, exhibitions, built works, collaborating with distinguished experts, etc.)

Evaluation Criteria 

Good (3)     Adequate (2)     Inadequate (1)

Value to the Department

To what degree doe the sabbatical outcomes benefit the department? (Program, accreditation, new course development, mentorship opportunities, course/program coordination, etc.)

      

Value to the Institution

How well does the proposal align with the academic/strategic plan of the University?

      

Value to the Students

What is the potential positive impact for students (e.g. number affected, undergraduate and/or graduate, new course development, etc.)?

      

Overall Quality of the Proposal

Is there sufficient documentation to assess the proposal including supporting material? Are the outcomes of the sabbatical clearly articulated? Is the proposal clear and well written?

      

Chair + Dean Recommendation

Level of support communicated in the recommendations from the department chair and dean