The proposal builds and expands the core competencies of the individual's disciplinary interests and expertise (e.g. acquiring new skills, mastering the newest information/technologies, etc.).
Pedagogy
The proposal seeks to develop new methodologies/techniques for teaching, course delivery, student assessment
Scholarship
The proposal advances the candidate's research pursuits (e.g. book proposals, research papers, exhibitions, built works, collaborating with distinguished experts, etc.)
Evaluation Criteria
Good (3) Adequate (2) Inadequate (1)
Value to the Department
To what degree doe the sabbatical outcomes benefit the department? (Program, accreditation, new course development, mentorship opportunities, course/program coordination, etc.)
Value to the Institution
How well does the proposal align with the academic/strategic plan of the University?
Value to the Students
What is the potential positive impact for students (e.g. number affected, undergraduate and/or graduate, new course development, etc.)?
Overall Quality of the Proposal
Is there sufficient documentation to assess the proposal including supporting material? Are the outcomes of the sabbatical clearly articulated? Is the proposal clear and well written?
Chair + Dean Recommendation
Level of support communicated in the recommendations from the department chair and dean